Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brian Edmunds's avatar

Thank you Jamie. You have grasped the increase in our government borrowing.

It is as clear as day that the over have no idea how to affect our economy to increase growth.

For well over the 25 years of sustained deficit the growth of our economy has NOT happened in sufficient terms to avoid the need for government borrowing.

That sustained ignorance to our nations need to earn more not pay more, is the reason we are where we are today. And will be in the next 25 years.

As the rich if this world, the ones who buy those gilts get richer with the interest we pay them then, they get more money to lend us!

Do thus becomes an ever increasing property for them and us. As our debt rises they earn more. They earn more they lend more by buying gilts. It’s not a mathematical calculation more an observation.

The general rule is that inflation is bad. And we must strangle a growing economy to stifle inflation, to keep inflation down. But all this does is stifle our economy!

Inflation is not bad. As long as incomes keep up with it. Inflation is a fact of life. It’s the natural rise in costs. In things they become scarce after being plentiful. Or raw materials that we run out of that we then import like oil and gas. Once we had it snd now we don’t do to speak.

And whoever said you can’t buck the market were right! You can’t keep costs down forever. Or pretend a price is a price forever.

But when the need is their to resupply the total money in circulation to cover the inflationary effects to give an equal supply to counteract that rise we fail ourselves! By NOT supplying it Jamie.

I’m not convinced that a MMT (modern monetary theory) is the answer. Just print what we need. As we all know the more we print the more we and the rest of the world devalue it’s worth, its value and its ability to swap for effort.

So unfortunately I think it’s a bit if a red herring. MMT.

But why don’t we just work with what’s already out there!!?? This is the part of our economy and your piece highlights.

Our money that we pay back goes somewhere.,it doesn’t disappear. It gets collected out of reach unless borrowed back.

Well Sod that!

Thus us where the government get it wrong. It’s our money. Not for keeping hold of. But for return.

So much if our money is exchanged for what we want, food energy you name it.

But our government must make better rules to make whoever gets it, SPEND it back. Not tax it for a small bit of profit. Or think a small bit of wealth will do, no!!

We need it all back so we can get the result of money for our economy to grow! Yes it must grow its supply of money to restock, resupply to re-SPEND. But growth is not limitless. It will grow to its optimum and then that, should be sufficient to not need to borrow it back. And will pay our way without a deficit. In other words we have replaced debt with the actual money being held by those who buy gilts. It’s a simple balanced equation Jamie.

And not forgetting. When we or they SPEND we get equal goods or asset in fair exchange. And when tax taken no exchange occurs directly and it’s fir s small piece of holdings. There is the power of SPENDING. It resupplies to the full.

Thus us all in the government remit. To at last track and trace money. Make it move back by those who have good of it by making them SPEND it rather then hold it to ransom and make us borrow our own money back!

No posts

Ready for more?