As Angela Rayner approves controversial asylum accommodation plans despite 3,177 objections, should Britain focus on stopping Channel crossings rather than paying for the consequences?
We own our country. We own the land, the history, the culture. We allow someone to represent us in parliament because we can't all go personally. We are sovereign. So why does Andy Burnham think he can let foreigners say what we can and can't do? Why does Angela Rayner make decisions which are against the wishes of We, The People? We are sovereign. They are employed by us. At what point do we act to remind parliament that of this?
Glad to hear the piece got the cogs turning! There is certainly a growing sense that Westminster has forgotten who actually signs their paycheques. Appreciate you sharing your thoughts and joining the discussion.
I sorry but you just do not understand the situation. It’s not the fact that Paddington, a rural village is too be swamped by over 1200 males whose background is unknown, but the fact that these jumped up Left loving Immigrants Welcome broke ranks and asked “Do not house hundreds of males amongst a village of women and female children, we are concerned”. Our “Ange” has stuck it to them, racists bastards, how dare they!, Diversity is Our Strenght!, now they can face the horrors the North has faced for almost forty years!.
Piddington is finished, it was once a rural idyllic place, now it is a place where fear is palpable, and why, because the residents objected to Labours preferred voter base, just look at the Front Bench and see how many rely, ney, require, the Muslim Islamic vote and since this is male driven via “family” voting, they have a major investment in ensuring that the “Right” voters arrive.
In North Yorkshire, the sleepy village of Linton on Ouse, it’s discarded RAF base will be used to house a similar number of single males, like Piddington, it is off the beaten track, too far to walk to the nearest town, poor public transport links, another village that has a problem………it’s just too damn white!, and that irks the Labour planners and “Our Ange”, so unleash the dogs of war, cry God Save The People and accept the fact 5hat Piddington and Linton on Ouse are collateral damage should anything untoward happen……I pray that nothing does but history on this matter is not on my side.
Thank you for sharing such a detailed perspective, Michael. The sheer scale of these sites compared to the local populations in places like Piddington and Linton on Ouse really highlights why rural infrastructure and community concerns are at the heart of this debate.
Completely agree Jamie. The government should employ ex Australian PM-Tony Abbott on a contract basis to oversee the implantation of a return of dinghies to the last safe country. He's done it before most successfully for Australia.
Now that would certainly shake things up in Whitehall, Alan! Bringing in someone with a proven track record on border deterrence is an idea plenty of people would get behind.
This got me thinking 🤔
We own our country. We own the land, the history, the culture. We allow someone to represent us in parliament because we can't all go personally. We are sovereign. So why does Andy Burnham think he can let foreigners say what we can and can't do? Why does Angela Rayner make decisions which are against the wishes of We, The People? We are sovereign. They are employed by us. At what point do we act to remind parliament that of this?
Glad to hear the piece got the cogs turning! There is certainly a growing sense that Westminster has forgotten who actually signs their paycheques. Appreciate you sharing your thoughts and joining the discussion.
I sorry but you just do not understand the situation. It’s not the fact that Paddington, a rural village is too be swamped by over 1200 males whose background is unknown, but the fact that these jumped up Left loving Immigrants Welcome broke ranks and asked “Do not house hundreds of males amongst a village of women and female children, we are concerned”. Our “Ange” has stuck it to them, racists bastards, how dare they!, Diversity is Our Strenght!, now they can face the horrors the North has faced for almost forty years!.
Piddington is finished, it was once a rural idyllic place, now it is a place where fear is palpable, and why, because the residents objected to Labours preferred voter base, just look at the Front Bench and see how many rely, ney, require, the Muslim Islamic vote and since this is male driven via “family” voting, they have a major investment in ensuring that the “Right” voters arrive.
In North Yorkshire, the sleepy village of Linton on Ouse, it’s discarded RAF base will be used to house a similar number of single males, like Piddington, it is off the beaten track, too far to walk to the nearest town, poor public transport links, another village that has a problem………it’s just too damn white!, and that irks the Labour planners and “Our Ange”, so unleash the dogs of war, cry God Save The People and accept the fact 5hat Piddington and Linton on Ouse are collateral damage should anything untoward happen……I pray that nothing does but history on this matter is not on my side.
Thank you for sharing such a detailed perspective, Michael. The sheer scale of these sites compared to the local populations in places like Piddington and Linton on Ouse really highlights why rural infrastructure and community concerns are at the heart of this debate.
Completely agree Jamie. The government should employ ex Australian PM-Tony Abbott on a contract basis to oversee the implantation of a return of dinghies to the last safe country. He's done it before most successfully for Australia.
Now that would certainly shake things up in Whitehall, Alan! Bringing in someone with a proven track record on border deterrence is an idea plenty of people would get behind.